|
|
Post by msmalin on Sept 30, 2022 12:51:15 GMT -5
Yes Phyllis, I'm looking at you and that blindingly atrocious rainbow gown that looked like cheap holographic wrapping paper. I thought that was bad enough, but it got 10x worse when she came.down the stairs and we saw the split down the front of both legs. I know it was my imagination but I thought I saw the money shot. WHAT WAS THAT?
|
|
|
|
Post by cappy on Sept 30, 2022 16:50:20 GMT -5
UGH! I agree with you, that is just about the most awful dress.
|
|
|
|
Post by LittleFan on Sept 30, 2022 18:28:02 GMT -5
Ugh, that's awful. At least the model doesn't have the neckline open to her waist. Phyllis thinks she's all that. I don't know if Michelle Stafford things she is, or does she just play Phyllis as someone who does?  |
|
|
|
Post by msmalin on Sept 30, 2022 18:47:55 GMT -5
The big question Lyndsey: will you be recreating it? 😉
It is no longer available (probably no demand for it) but I think the price was $550.
|
|
|
|
Post by LittleFan on Sept 30, 2022 18:57:18 GMT -5
No, I won't be recreating it. I wouldn't want to waste my time or money. Also, much less of a factor: I can't really figure out patterns, so it's really hard for me to recreate fashions most of the time.
The dress looks like an oil slick.
|
|
|
|
Post by deirdra on Sept 30, 2022 20:35:36 GMT -5
Is that Phyllis' "Mother of the Bride" dress? Way to outshine (literally) her daughter on her second special day.
|
|
|
|
Post by LittleFan on Sept 30, 2022 20:51:35 GMT -5
Maybe Chelsea designed it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deirdra on Sept 30, 2022 21:46:35 GMT -5
Maybe Chelsea designed it. Ha ha. And she had to put two sleeves on this one because there was no other way to hold up the dress with no front. |
|
|
|
Post by twokeets on Oct 5, 2022 16:10:22 GMT -5
A very Phyllis kind of thing to wear. It's so ridiculous, I kind of like it.
|
|
